What types of compliance documents can ComplianceIQ generate?

ComplianceIQ generates privacy policies, terms of service, employee handbooks, data handling policies, OSHA compliance documents, acceptable use policies, HIPAA compliance docs, information security policies, and more — all tailored to your industry.

Are the generated documents legally valid?

ComplianceIQ generates comprehensive, industry-standard compliance documents informed by current regulations. While they provide an excellent foundation, we recommend having critical documents reviewed by legal counsel for your specific jurisdiction.

How does ComplianceIQ stay current with regulations?

Our AI models are continuously updated with the latest regulatory frameworks including GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA, SOC 2, OSHA, and more. Pro and Enterprise plans include regulatory update alerts.

← All calendars

NIST CSF 2.0 · 15 RECURRING ACTIVITIES

NIST CSF 2.0 Compliance Calendar — Govern + the five Functions in cadence

CSF 2.0 added the GOVERN function and put leadership oversight on equal footing with the original five Functions. This calendar maps the recurring obligations that map cleanly to FISMA / FedRAMP / 800-53 baselines too.

Cadence mix:1× Weekly2× Monthly3× Quarterly1× Every 6 months6× Annually2× Event-triggered

Who this is for

Federal contractors aligning to CSF + FISMA + 800-53
Critical infrastructure / OT operators using CSF as risk language
Mid-market enterprises using CSF as a flexible umbrella across SOC 2 / ISO / HIPAA

Typical effort

Variable. CSF doesn't define cadence — derive from your selected target Profile + risk tolerance.

The calendar

Weekly (1)

Continuous monitoring — alert review

DETECT

Review of SIEM / EDR / NDR alerts; documented triage.

Reference

DE.CM, DE.AE

Owner

Security ops

Effort

Variable

Evidence

Triage tickets

Monthly (2)

Configuration baseline drift check

PROTECT

Compare prod baseline against approved standard (CIS / DISA STIG / internal). Investigate drift.

Reference

PR.IP-1, PR.PT-3

Owner

DevOps + Security

Effort

4 hrs

Evidence

Drift report

Asset inventory reconciliation

IDENTIFY

Reconcile CMDB / cloud account / endpoint inventory with discovery scan. Investigate ghost assets.

Reference

ID.AM-1, ID.AM-2

Owner

IT + Security

Effort

2–4 hrs

Evidence

Inventory delta report

Quarterly (3)

Risk register review (leadership)

GOVERN

Top risks, treatment progress, residual risk reviewed by exec leadership. CSF 2.0 raises this from optional to expected.

Reference

GV.RM, GV.OC, GV.OV

Owner

Exec + Security

Effort

2 hrs

Evidence

Risk register + exec minutes

Privileged access review

PROTECT

Manager-certified; remove dormant + unjustified.

Reference

PR.AC-4, PR.AC-7

Owner

Manager + IT

Effort

3–4 hrs

Evidence

Access review

Supply chain re-tier

IDENTIFY

CSF 2.0 elevates supply-chain risk (GV.SC). Re-tier critical vendors; refresh attestations.

Reference

GV.SC, ID.SC

Owner

Procurement + Security

Effort

4–6 hrs

Evidence

Supply chain register

Every 6 months (1)

Recovery plan exercise

RECOVER

Exercise at least one critical service recovery; measure RTO/RPO; update plan.

Reference

RC.RP, RC.IM

Owner

DevOps + Security

Effort

8–16 hrs

Evidence

Recovery exercise report

Annually (6)

Risk assessment

IDENTIFY

Refresh enterprise risk assessment + supply chain risk; align to current threat landscape; reassess Profile.

Reference

ID.RA, ID.RM, GV.RM

Owner

Security + Risk

Effort

16–24 hrs

Evidence

Updated risk assessment

Cybersecurity strategy + Profile review

GOVERN

Review current vs target Profile gap; update strategy and resource allocation.

Reference

GV.SF, GV.OC, GV.RM

Owner

Exec + Security leadership

Effort

8–16 hrs

Evidence

Profile gap + roadmap

Awareness + role-based training

PROTECT

All workforce + role-specific (sysadmin, dev, IR responder, exec).

Reference

PR.AT-1, PR.AT-2

Owner

Security + HR

Effort

4 hrs admin

Evidence

Training records

Incident response tabletop

RESPOND

Test scenario incl. supply-chain compromise + ransomware; measure decision quality + comms.

Reference

RS.MA, RS.AN, RS.CO

Owner

Incident team

Effort

4–6 hrs

Evidence

After-action report

Penetration test

PROTECT

External + internal; remediate critical/high.

Reference

PR.IP-12, DE.CM-8

Owner

Pen tester

Effort

Vendor + 16 hrs internal

Evidence

Pen test + remediation

Policy + procedure review

GOVERN

Every cybersecurity policy reviewed, approved, communicated.

Reference

GV.PO

Owner

GRC + Exec

Effort

8 hrs

Evidence

Updated policy library

Event-triggered (2)

Cybersecurity incident handling

RESPOND

Activate IR; coordinate with stakeholders incl. law enforcement / sector ISAC if relevant; lessons learned.

Reference

RS.MA, RS.AN, RS.CO, RS.MI, RS.IM

Owner

Incident lead

Effort

Variable

Evidence

Incident record + lessons

Major change to environment

IDENTIFY

M&A, new product, new cloud — re-baseline asset inventory + risk + Profile.

Reference

ID.AM, ID.RA, GV.OC

Owner

Security + Architecture

Effort

Variable

Evidence

Change + reassessment record

Pitfalls — where teams actually fail

Treating CSF as a checklist — CSF expects target Profile + measured progress, not pure pass/fail.
Skipping GOVERN — CSF 2.0 elevated GOVERN to a peer of the other Functions; ignoring it leaves leadership oversight ungoverned.
Supply-chain risk done annually only — major incidents (SolarWinds, MOVEit) showed quarterly tier review is the working norm.
Continuous monitoring described as 'we have SIEM' — DE.CM expects measured detection efficacy, not just tool deployment.
Using 800-53 as 'the framework' but no documented mapping back to CSF Profile or organisational risk tolerance.

Want this calendar mapped to YOUR controls?

Drop your existing NIST CSF 2.0 policy or upload a draft — ComplianceIQ scores it against the framework and produces a 0–100 audit, gap-by-gap with the cadence work you're missing.

Run free NIST CSF 2.0 audit See readiness checklist

What happens when the cadence slips — real NIST CSF 2.0 actions

$148M

Uber · 2018

$35M SEC + $117.5M class

Altaba (Yahoo) · 2018

FAQ

Is NIST CSF mandatory for anyone?

Not by itself. But agencies / contractors using FISMA, FedRAMP, or 800-171 will reference CSF + 800-53 mappings. Many critical infrastructure sectors are now expected to implement CSF as part of CIRCIA / sector regulation.

What changed for ongoing cadence in CSF 2.0 vs 1.1?

GOVERN is the new sixth Function. Supply-chain risk (GV.SC) elevated. Outcomes apply to organisations of any size. Ongoing oversight + leadership accountability are now explicit recurring expectations.

Can we use this calendar to satisfy 800-53 / FedRAMP cadence?

Many controls map (CA-2 monthly continuous monitoring, RA-3 annual risk, AT-2 annual training, IR-3 annual tabletop, CP-4 annual contingency test). FedRAMP adds specific monthly POA&M + scan submission timelines on top — see your SSP.

How often should the target CSF Profile be reviewed?

Annually as a minimum (alongside risk assessment). After any major change in mission, environment, or threat landscape.

NIST CSF 2.0 Compliance Calendar — Govern + the five Functions in cadence

The calendar

Weekly (1)

Monthly (2)

Quarterly (3)

Every 6 months (1)

Annually (6)

Event-triggered (2)

Pitfalls — where teams actually fail

What happens when the cadence slips — real NIST CSF 2.0 actions

FAQ

Other calendars